Logo
Home
>
Investment Strategies
>
Balance between concentrated bets and diversified safety

Balance between concentrated bets and diversified safety

08/29/2025
Felipe Moraes
Balance between concentrated bets and diversified safety

In today’s dynamic markets, investors face the perennial dilemma of choosing between focused positions and broad diversification. Striking the right balance is not only an art—it’s a strategic necessity. This article explores how you can reconcile focused high-conviction investment opportunities with the protective power of diversified portfolios.

By combining empirical data, legendary investor insights, and practical guidelines, you’ll learn to craft a portfolio that aligns with your goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Let’s embark on this journey toward optimal risk-reward balance framework.

Benefits of Concentration

Concentrated portfolios focus on a select group of 5–30 high-conviction positions. When executed well, they often deliver exceptional returns. Historical studies reveal that Top 5 concentrated strategies beat benchmarks by over 5% per annum, while Top 30 strategies outperform by about 2.1% per annum.

Legendary investors like Buffett, Druckenmiller, and Soros argue that focused bets harness deep research and conviction. Concentration can:

  • Amplify returns through statistically significant performance edge
  • Increase Sharpe ratios when positions are truly high conviction
  • Encourage thorough due diligence and discipline
  • Allow swift adjustments in response to new information

However, greater potential comes with behavioral impact of concentrated bets. Investors must withstand higher volatility and the emotional strain of drawdowns.

Benefits of Diversification

Diversified portfolios spread capital across asset classes, sectors, geographies, and factors. This approach smooths returns and mitigates idiosyncratic risk. Broad diversification offers:

  • Lower overall volatility through uncorrelated holdings
  • Steady income and capital preservation in turbulent markets
  • Improved risk-adjusted performance over long periods
  • A defense against unforeseen sectoral or geopolitical shocks

Institutional guidelines often recommend no single stock exceeding 5% of the portfolio, diversification by market cap, style, and region, and periodic rebalancing to maintain target exposures.

Risk Analysis

Understanding risk is pivotal. Concentrated bets exhibit betas above 1, but as positions increase toward 25–30 stocks, beta trends toward 1 and volatility declines. Beyond 30 positions, little additional risk reduction occurs, indicating a point of diminishing returns on diversification.

Behavioral finance teaches that investors react emotionally to large drawdowns. Concentrated portfolios can trigger panic selling, eroding long-term performance. Conversely, over-diversification—sometimes called “diworsification”—can dilute skill and lead to index-like returns without the benefit of outperformance.

Case Studies & Data

Long-term data from State Street (since 1926) suggest that diversified portfolios outperform concentrated top 10% portfolios more than half of the time over rolling ten-year periods. The average streak of diversified outperformance spans 38 consecutive decades, demonstrating that steady broad exposure often prevails.

Yet, during strong bull markets—such as the 1990s tech rally—concentrated strategies generated spectacular gains, tempting many investors to abandon diversification only to face mean reversion in subsequent years.

Practical Guidelines

Balancing concentration and diversification requires a clear framework. Follow these steps to construct your optimal portfolio:

  • Assess your risk tolerance and investment horizon
  • Identify 5–10 highest-conviction ideas for potential concentration
  • Allocate the remainder across diversified assets—equities, bonds, commodities
  • Rebalance quarterly to maintain target weights and capture gains

Remember to incorporate customized risk-management framework and goals when deciding the split. If you can withstand volatility and possess unique insights, a 60/40 split (concentrated/diversified) might suit aggressive objectives. Conservative investors may opt for 20/80.

Conclusion

No single approach guarantees success. Concentrated bets can unlock exceptional returns, while diversified safety preserves capital and smooths the ride. The ideal strategy blends both: allocating to high-conviction positions without sacrificing the stability that diversification provides.

By defining your objectives, acknowledging behavioral biases, and adhering to disciplined rebalancing, you can achieve a portfolio that reflects your convictions and safeguards your future. Embrace the synergy of focus and breadth to navigate markets with confidence and resilience.

Felipe Moraes

About the Author: Felipe Moraes

Felipe Moraes